Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard O'Shaughnessy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) GalatzTalk 22:57, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Richard O'Shaughnessy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person holding non-notable job GalatzTalk 14:18, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. GalatzTalk 14:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. GalatzTalk 14:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 14:29, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 14:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete Fails GNG, NATHLETE, etc. South Nashua (talk) 14:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@South Nashua: In view of the rescue efforts and the nominator's WP:HEY comments below, would you consider withdrawing your "Delete" vote? Cbl62 (talk) 16:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Cbl62: Wow, big improvement there. Yeah, My bad on this one. Happy to change to a Keep. Unsure why the article creator just didn't add all of that in the first place. South Nashua (talk) 19:20, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. The article was a real mess at the time of the nomination. I have undertaken some rescue efforts this morning. Cbl62 (talk) 16:32, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.